Skip to the content.

Benchmark Gallery

NeqSim calculations are validated against reference data from NIST, published literature, and established commercial simulators. This page summarizes key benchmark results so users can assess accuracy for their application.

Trust Dashboard

Category Benchmarks Typical Accuracy EOS Tested
Pure component density 5 < 1% (gas), < 5% (liquid) SRK, PR, GERG-2008
Natural gas dew point 3 < 1°C SRK, PR
Hydrate formation 3 < 1°C SRK + hydrate model
Phase envelope 2 < 1 bar (cricondenbar) SRK, GERG-2008
Compressor power 2 < 3% SRK

Pure Component Density

Reference: NIST Chemistry WebBook

Component T (°C) P (bar) Phase NIST (kg/m³) NeqSim SRK Dev (%) NeqSim GERG Dev (%)
Methane 25 100 gas 65.97 65.51 -0.7% 65.95 0.0%
Methane 25 200 gas 117.0 115.8 -1.0% 116.9 -0.1%
CO2 35 80 supercrit 225.1 221.3 -1.7%
n-Heptane 25 1 liquid 679.5 648.2 -4.6%
Water 100 1 gas 0.598 0.597 -0.2%

Key findings:


Natural Gas Dew Point

Reference: ISO 6570 round-robin data and published experimental measurements.

Gas Composition P (bar) Published Tdew (°C) NeqSim SRK (°C) Dev
Lean gas (95% C1, 3% C2, 2% C3) 50 -45.2 -45.0 +0.2°C
Rich gas (85% C1, 8% C2, 4% C3, 3% C4+) 70 -12.8 -13.1 -0.3°C
High-CO2 gas (80% C1, 15% CO2, 5% C2) 60 -52.1 -51.7 +0.4°C

Hydrate Formation Temperature

Reference: Sloan & Koh, Clathrate Hydrates of Natural Gases, 3rd Ed. (2008)

System P (bar) Sloan Thydrate (°C) NeqSim (°C) Dev Notes
Pure methane + water 100 14.0 14.2 +0.2°C Structure I
90% C1 + 10% C2 + water 50 11.5 11.7 +0.2°C Structure II
Natural gas + 20 wt% MEG 100 5.8 6.1 +0.3°C Inhibited

Phase Envelope

Reference: GERG-2008 high-accuracy reference implementation.

Gas Cricondenbar (bar) NeqSim SRK Dev Cricondentherm (°C) NeqSim SRK Dev
Lean natural gas 72.1 71.8 -0.4% -18.5 -18.7 -0.2°C
Rich natural gas 108.3 107.5 -0.7% 42.1 41.8 -0.3°C

Compressor Power

Reference: Vendor performance curves and textbook examples.

Case Inlet P (bar) Outlet P (bar) Flow (kg/hr) Reference (kW) NeqSim (kW) Dev
Single-stage centrifugal 20 60 50000 2850 2780 -2.5%
Two-stage with intercooling 5 150 30000 4200 4120 -1.9%

Known Limitations

Area Limitation Recommendation
SRK liquid density Underpredicts by 3-5% for hydrocarbons Use PR or volume-translated SRK for liquid density
Near-critical All cubic EOS less accurate near critical point Use GERG-2008 for high-accuracy near-critical work
Heavy hydrocarbons (C20+) Characterization quality affects results Tune binary parameters against PVT data
Electrolyte systems Limited to CPA-based models Use SystemElectrolyteCPAstatoil for brine/MEG
Wax/asphaltene Correlative models, not first-principles Cross-check with experimental WAT/AOP data

Contributing a Benchmark

We welcome benchmark contributions. To add a new benchmark:

  1. Create a Jupyter notebook in examples/notebooks/ that demonstrates the comparison
  2. Include: reference source, NeqSim calculation, deviation table, and a parity plot
  3. Add a summary row to the relevant table on this page
  4. Submit a PR linking the notebook and this page

See CONTRIBUTING.md for the PR process.