Introduction to Agentic Engineering with NeqSim
In one sentence: you describe an engineering problem in plain language, an AI agent writes and runs the simulation, and the NeqSim physics engine makes sure the numbers are right.
This guide is written for engineers and scientists who are new to AI-assisted workflows. No prior experience with AI agents is assumed.
Reading time: about 25 minutes end to end. The first hands-on example takes 5 minutes.
What you will learn
- What agentic programming means, and why it matters for engineering
- How NeqSim’s three-layer agent architecture works
- The difference between an agent, a skill, and the physics engine
- How to run your first agent command
- How to go from a one-line question to a complete engineering report
Who this is for: process engineers, reservoir engineers, thermodynamics specialists, and anyone who wants AI speed without losing physical rigor.
What you need: VS Code, GitHub Copilot, Python 3.8+, and Java 8+. The setup commands are in Prerequisites.
Pick your reading path
| If you are… | Start at | Then read |
|---|---|---|
| New to AI agents | 1. Why AI alone is not enough | Everything, in order |
| Familiar with AI, new to NeqSim | 3. Architecture | Sections 4, 5, 7 |
| In a hurry | 7. Your first agent interaction | Section 10, then the Cheat sheet |
| Evaluating the approach | 11. Comparison | Sections 1 and 6 |
Contents
Part I — Concepts
- The problem: AI alone cannot do engineering
- What is agentic programming?
- NeqSim’s agent architecture
Part II — The toolbox
Part III — Doing the work
Part IV — Reference
- How the physics engine works
- Best practices
- Comparison with traditional approaches
- Where to go next
- Cheat sheet and Glossary
Part I — Concepts
1. The Problem: AI Alone Cannot Do Engineering
Large Language Models (LLMs) such as GPT, Claude, and Copilot are remarkable at understanding natural language, writing code, and reasoning about structure. But they have one fundamental limitation for engineering work.
Key point: LLMs hallucinate physics. They predict plausible text, they do not solve equations.
Ask an LLM “what is the density of methane at 200 bara and 25 degrees C?” and you may get a confident but wrong answer. It cannot solve the cubic equation of state, iterate to the correct compressibility factor, evaluate fugacity coefficients, or check phase stability.
NeqSim has the opposite problem. It does all of the above with thermodynamic rigor, but it has no understanding of natural language, cannot interpret engineering intent, and returns raw numbers without context.
| Language model | NeqSim engine | |
|---|---|---|
| Understands intent | Yes | No |
| Writes code | Yes | No |
| Solves an EOS | No | Yes |
| Guarantees the number | No | Yes |
The solution: combine them.
┌─────────────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────────────────┐
│ AI Agent │ │ NeqSim Physics │
│ │ │ │
│ Understands intent │────▶│ SRK / PR / CPA / GERG EOS │
│ Selects methods │ │ Flash calculations │
│ Writes simulation code │◀────│ Phase equilibrium │
│ Interprets results │ │ Transport properties │
│ Generates reports │ │ Process equipment models │
│ Manages workflows │ │ Standards (ISO, API, DNV) │
│ │ │ Mechanical design │
└─────────────────────────┘ └─────────────────────────────┘
The AI agent writes the code. NeqSim runs the physics. You get validated results.
2. What is Agentic Programming?
Agentic programming is a software design pattern where an AI model does not just answer questions — it takes actions, uses tools, and completes multi-step tasks autonomously.
In traditional AI usage, you ask a question and get an answer:
You: "What EOS should I use for natural gas with water?"
AI: "Use SRK-CPA (SystemSrkCPAstatoil) with mixing rule 10."
In agentic programming, you describe a goal and the agent executes it:
You: "Calculate the hydrate formation temperature for this wet gas
at 100 bara, and generate a report."
Agent: 1. Creates a CPA fluid with the gas composition
2. Adds water at saturation
3. Runs hydrate equilibrium calculation via NeqSim
4. Sweeps pressure from 20 to 200 bara
5. Creates a plot of the hydrate curve
6. Validates against literature data
7. Generates a Word + HTML report
The agent has access to tools — it can read files, search code, run simulations, create notebooks, and generate reports. Each tool is a capability the agent can invoke when needed.
Key Concepts
| Concept | Definition | NeqSim Example |
|---|---|---|
| Agent | An AI with a specific purpose, instructions, and tool access | @solve-task solves engineering problems end-to-end |
| Skill | A knowledge package loaded on-demand by agents | neqsim-api-patterns — code recipes for creating fluids |
| Tool | A capability the agent can invoke (read file, run code, search) | Terminal execution, file creation, notebook cell runner |
| Physics Engine | The computational backend that does the math | NeqSim Java library (EOS, flash, equipment models) |
| Workflow | A structured multi-step process the agent follows | 3-step: Scope & Research → Analysis → Report |
Why Agents Instead of Scripts?
Traditional automation (scripts, macros) is brittle — it breaks when inputs change. Agents are adaptive:
| Aspect | Script | Agent |
|---|---|---|
| Input format | Must be exact | Natural language |
| Error handling | Crashes or silent failure | Diagnoses and retries |
| Missing data | Stops | Makes documented assumptions |
| New requirement | Write new script | Describe what you want |
| Learning | None | Searches past solutions |
3. NeqSim’s Agent Architecture
NeqSim provides a multi-agent system where specialist agents handle different engineering disciplines. A router agent directs requests to the right specialist, and skills provide domain knowledge that agents load on demand.
Architecture Overview
┌───────────────────────┐
│ Your Request │
│ "size a pipeline │
│ and check hydrates" │
└──────────┬────────────┘
│
┌──────────▼────────────┐
│ @neqsim.help │
│ (Router Agent) │
└──┬────────────────┬───┘
│ │
┌──────────▼───┐ ┌───────▼──────────┐
│ @process-model│ │ @flow-assurance │
│ (Pipeline P,T)│ │ (Hydrate curve) │
└──────┬───────┘ └───────┬──────────┘
│ │
┌──────▼────────────────────▼──────┐
│ NeqSim Java Engine │
│ (SRK-CPA, PipeBeggsAndBrills, │
│ HydrateEquilibriumTemperature) │
└───────────────────────────────────┘
The Three Layers
Layer 1: Agents — Specialist AI assistants, each trained for a specific
engineering discipline. You invoke them with @agent-name in VS Code Copilot
Chat.
Layer 2: Skills — Reusable knowledge packages that agents load when needed. A skill contains patterns, rules, and reference data — not code, but the knowledge needed to write correct code.
Layer 3: NeqSim Physics Engine — The Java library that performs all thermodynamic, transport, and process calculations. Agents generate code that calls this engine.
How They Work Together
- You describe an engineering problem in natural language
- The router agent analyzes your request and identifies the domain(s)
- The appropriate specialist agent(s) are invoked
- Each agent loads relevant skills (EOS selection rules, validation checks)
- The agent writes Python/Java code that calls the NeqSim engine
- NeqSim computes the physics (flash calculations, equipment models, etc.)
- The agent interprets results and presents them with context
Part II — The Toolbox
4. The Agent Catalog
NeqSim provides 16 specialist agents, organized by function. You invoke one by
typing its @name at the start of a message in VS Code Copilot Chat.
If you remember only one thing: when in doubt, type
@neqsim.helpand describe the problem in plain language. It routes the request for you.
Routing and Discovery
These agents help you find the right tool for the job.
| Agent | Command | What It Does |
|---|---|---|
| Router | @neqsim.help |
Analyzes your request and routes to the correct specialist. Use when unsure which agent to pick. |
| Capability Scout | @capability-scout |
Checks what NeqSim can do for a task. Identifies gaps and plans implementations. Use before complex multi-discipline work. |
Example:
@neqsim.help I need to design a gas export pipeline with hydrate
management and cost estimation
The router detects three disciplines (process, flow assurance, mechanical design) and composes a multi-agent pipeline.
Engineering Specialists
| Agent | Command | Engineering Discipline |
|---|---|---|
| Thermodynamic Fluid | @thermo-fluid |
Create fluids, select EOS, run flash calculations, get properties |
| Process Simulation | @process-model |
Build flowsheets with separators, compressors, heat exchangers, valves |
| PVT Simulation | @pvt-simulation |
Run lab experiments (CME, CVD, swelling test, saturation pressure) |
| Flow Assurance | @flow-assurance |
Hydrate prediction, wax, corrosion, pipeline pressure drop |
| Gas Quality | @gas-quality |
ISO 6976, EN 16726, Wobbe index, custody transfer |
| Mechanical Design | @mechanical-design |
Wall thickness, material selection, cost estimation per ASME/DNV/API |
| Safety | @safety-depressuring |
Blowdown, PSV sizing, fire case, source term generation |
| Field Development | @field-development |
Concept selection, subsea tieback, economics (NPV/IRR), production forecasting |
Workflow and Productivity
| Agent | Command | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Solve Engineering Task | @solve-task |
End-to-end task solving with 3-step workflow (scope, simulation, report) |
| Quick Process Sim | @solve-process |
Fast path to a working simulation notebook |
| Jupyter Notebook | @notebook-example |
Creates example notebooks with visualization |
| Unit Tests | @neqsim-test |
Writes JUnit 5 tests for NeqSim code |
| Documentation | @documentation |
Creates and updates markdown guides and tutorials |
5. The Skills Library
Skills are knowledge packages that agents load automatically when relevant. They contain rules, patterns, and reference data — not executable code, but the knowledge needed to produce correct code.
Why Skills Matter
Without skills, an agent might:
- Use the wrong equation of state for a polar system
- Forget to call
initProperties()after a flash calculation - Use Java 9+ features that won’t compile
- Miss a critical validation step
Skills encode the lessons learned from hundreds of simulations.
Available Skills
| Skill | What It Contains | Loaded When |
|---|---|---|
| neqsim-api-patterns | Code recipes for creating fluids, running flashes, using equipment | Writing any NeqSim code |
| neqsim-capability-map | Inventory of all NeqSim capabilities by discipline | Checking “can NeqSim do X?” |
| neqsim-input-validation | Rules for valid temperature, pressure, composition, component names | Setting up any simulation |
| neqsim-troubleshooting | Recovery strategies for convergence failures, zero values, phase issues | When a simulation fails |
| neqsim-physics-explanations | Plain-language explanations of JT effect, retrograde condensation, hydrate formation | Explaining results to users |
| neqsim-regression-baselines | How to capture baseline values and write regression tests | Modifying EOS or solver code |
| neqsim-agent-handoff | Structured schemas for passing data between agents | Multi-agent pipelines |
| neqsim-notebook-patterns | Jupyter notebook structure, import patterns, visualization rules | Creating notebooks |
| neqsim-java8-rules | Forbidden Java 9+ features and replacement patterns | Writing any Java code |
| neqsim-field-development | Field development lifecycle, concept selection, reservoir/well/facility workflows | Field development studies |
| neqsim-field-economics | NPV, IRR, cash flow, tax regimes (Norwegian NCS, UK), cost estimation | Project economics |
| neqsim-subsea-and-wells | Subsea systems, well design (API 5C3), SURF costs, tieback analysis | Subsea/well engineering |
| neqsim-production-optimization | Decline curves, bottleneck analysis, gas lift, IOR/EOR screening | Production optimization |
How Skills Are Used
Skills are loaded automatically based on context. When you ask
@process-model to build a compressor train, it automatically loads:
neqsim-api-patterns— to use the correct Java API callsneqsim-input-validation— to check your pressure and temperature valuesneqsim-java8-rules— if it needs to write any Java code
You don’t need to request skills explicitly — the agent knows which ones to load based on what you asked for.
Part III — Doing the Work
6. The Task-Solving Workflow
NeqSim’s most powerful pattern is the 3-step task-solving workflow that the
@solve-task agent executes automatically.
The Three Steps
STEP 1 STEP 2 STEP 3
───────────────── ───────────────── ─────────────────
Scope & Research Analysis & Evaluation Report
• Define standards • Build simulation • Generate Word doc
• Select methods • Run NeqSim calculations • Generate HTML page
• Set acceptance criteria • Validate results • Include figures
• Research background • Create visualizations • Save results.json
• Identify NeqSim gaps • Benchmark against data
Every Task Gets a Folder
When you invoke @solve-task, it immediately creates a structured folder:
task_solve/2026-03-21_hydrate_analysis/
├── README.md ← Progress checklist
├── results.json ← Machine-readable results
├── figures/ ← Saved PNG plots
├── step1_scope_and_research/
│ ├── task_spec.md ← Standards, methods, criteria
│ ├── notes.md ← Research notes
│ └── references/ ← PDFs, standards
├── step2_analysis/
│ ├── 01_hydrate_analysis.ipynb ← Main simulation notebook
│ ├── 02_benchmark_validation.ipynb ← Comparison against reference data
│ └── 03_uncertainty_risk.ipynb ← Monte Carlo and risk register
└── step3_report/
└── generate_report.py ← Produces Word + HTML
Adaptive Depth
The same workflow handles everything from a quick property lookup to a Class A field development study. The depth adapts to what you ask for:
| You Ask For | What Happens |
|---|---|
| “density of CO2 at 200 bar” | Quick: one flash calculation, brief answer |
| “TEG dehydration for 50 MMSCFD per NORSOK” | Standard: full task folder, notebook, Word + HTML report |
| “field development concept selection per DNV and NORSOK” | Comprehensive: multiple notebooks, Monte Carlo, risk analysis, formal report |
The Development Flywheel
What makes this workflow unique is that solving tasks and developing NeqSim happen simultaneously. When an agent discovers a missing capability:
Task → uses NeqSim API → discovers gap → implements improvement → PR back
↓
next task has better API
Every solved task makes NeqSim more capable for the next task.
Readiness Gate for Agentic Task Packages
NeqSim also exposes a deterministic readiness action in the
runAgenticEngineering kernel. Agents can call action: "readiness" before
long simulations, report generation, or design review to avoid proceeding with
missing scope, benchmark, uncertainty, risk, or consistency evidence.
The readiness gate accepts a JSON artifact inventory and/or embedded
results.json sections, then returns:
- a weighted score and readiness level (
NOT_READY,READY_FOR_SIMULATION,READY_FOR_REPORT, orREADY_FOR_DESIGN_REVIEW), - a checklist with
PASS,WARN, andFAILitems, - critical gaps that block design decisions, and
- next actions that an agent can execute to close the gaps.
Minimal example:
{
"action": "readiness",
"scale": "standard",
"artifacts": [
{"path": "step1_scope_and_research/task_spec.md"},
{"path": "step1_scope_and_research/capability_assessment.md"},
{"path": "results.json"},
{"path": "consistency_report.json"}
],
"result": {
"key_results": {"pressure_drop_bar": 3.2},
"validation": {"acceptance_criteria_met": true},
"benchmark_validation": {"status": "PASS"},
"uncertainty": {"p50": 1.0},
"risk_evaluation": {"overall_risk_level": "Medium"}
}
}
This turns the task folder into an auditable engineering package instead of a collection of notebooks. The gate is intentionally side-effect free, so MCP servers, notebooks, and CI jobs can run it repeatedly while a task is being developed.
7. Getting Started: Your First Agent Interaction
This section takes you from an empty machine to a validated engineering report. Work through it in order.
Prerequisites
| Requirement | Purpose |
|---|---|
| VS Code | Editor that hosts the chat |
| GitHub Copilot extension | AI agent host |
| Python 3.8+ | Runs the analysis notebooks |
| Java JDK 8+ | NeqSim physics engine |
Step 1 — Set up (once)
# Clone the repository
git clone https://github.com/equinor/neqsim.git
cd neqsim
# Build NeqSim
./mvnw install # Linux/Mac
mvnw.cmd install # Windows
# Install Python helpers
pip install neqsim # Released package
pip install matplotlib python-docx # For plots and reports
Step 2 — Open the chat
Open VS Code in the cloned folder and open Copilot Chat
(Ctrl+Alt+I on Windows/Linux, Cmd+Alt+I on macOS). Agents are invoked by
typing @ followed by the agent name.
Step 3 — Work through the four examples
The examples below escalate from a single number to a full deliverable. Run them in order the first time; each one introduces a new capability.
| Example | Agent | Effort | You get |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Property lookup | @thermo-fluid |
Seconds | One validated number |
| 2. Process simulation | @process-model |
Minutes | A running flowsheet |
| 3. Full engineering task | @solve-task |
Longer | Task folder + report |
| 4. Capability assessment | @capability-scout |
Minutes | A gap analysis |
Example 1 — Quick property lookup
Type this into Copilot Chat:
@thermo-fluid What is the density of methane at 100 bara and 25 degrees C?
The agent will:
- Create a
SystemSrkEosfluid with methane - Run a TP flash at 298.15 K and 100 bara
- Call
initProperties()to initialize transport properties - Report the density in kg/m3
Why this matters: step 3 is the single most common mistake when writing NeqSim code by hand. The agent never forgets it, because a skill enforces it.
Example 2 — Process simulation
@process-model Build a 3-stage compression train from 5 to 150 bara
with intercooling to 35 degrees C after each stage
The agent will:
- Create the feed fluid
- Add three compressor and cooler pairs
- Set intermediate pressures using an equal compression ratio
- Build a
ProcessSystemand run it - Report power consumption and outlet temperature for each stage
Example 3 — Full engineering task
@solve-task Calculate the hydrate formation temperature for a wet natural
gas at pressures from 20 to 200 bara. The gas composition is 85% methane,
8% ethane, 4% propane, 2% CO2, 1% N2 with water-saturated conditions.
Compare against CSMHyd data.
The agent executes the complete 3-step workflow — scope, simulation with validation, and report generation — producing a Word document with figures, tables, and references.
Example 4 — Capability assessment
Before starting a complex task, check what NeqSim can do:
@capability-scout Can NeqSim handle acid gas injection design with
H2S/CO2 phase behavior, well casing design, corrosion assessment,
and NPV economics?
The scout returns a structured capability matrix showing what is available, what has limitations, and what is missing — with recommended agents and implementation plans for any gaps.
8. Multi-Agent Composition
For complex tasks spanning multiple disciplines, agents can work together
in pipelines. The router agent or @solve-task automatically composes
these pipelines when it detects cross-discipline needs.
Common Composition Patterns
Pattern 1: Process + Mechanical
Task: “Design a 20-inch export pipeline for 150 bara”
@process-model → Get operating conditions (P, T, flow, composition)
↓
@mechanical-design → Calculate wall thickness per DNV-OS-F101
Pattern 2: Fluid + Flow Assurance
Task: “Check for hydrates in a wet gas pipeline”
@thermo-fluid → Create CPA fluid with water and MEG
↓
@flow-assurance → Run hydrate curve + pipeline P,T profile
Pattern 3: Capability Scout + Specialists
Task: “Full field development study with subsea tieback”
@capability-scout → Assess all needed capabilities, identify gaps
↓
@process-model → Steady-state process design
↓
@flow-assurance → Pipeline sizing and hydrate management
↓
@mechanical-design → Equipment sizing and SURF cost estimation
↓
@solve-task → Economics (NPV), uncertainty, risk analysis, report
Part IV — Reference
9. How the Physics Engine Works
Every agent interaction ultimately calls the NeqSim Java library. Understanding the basics helps you write better prompts and interpret results correctly.
Thermodynamic Models
NeqSim solves equations of state (EOS) to compute fluid properties:
| EOS | Best For | Java Class |
|---|---|---|
| SRK | Dry gas, lean gas, simple hydrocarbons | SystemSrkEos |
| PR | General hydrocarbons, oil systems | SystemPrEos |
| SRK-CPA | Water, MEG, methanol, polar molecules | SystemSrkCPAstatoil |
| GERG-2008 | Custody transfer, fiscal metering | SystemGERG2008Eos |
The Flash Calculation
The core of all thermodynamic calculations is the flash — given conditions (temperature, pressure, composition), find how many phases exist and what their properties are.
Input: T = 298.15 K, P = 100 bara, z = [0.85 CH4, 0.10 C2H6, 0.05 C3H8]
↓
Flash: Solve cubic EOS → find phase fractions, compositions, properties
↓
Output: 1 phase (gas), density = 78.5 kg/m3, Z = 0.82, Cp = 2450 J/(kg·K)
Process Equipment
NeqSim models 40+ types of process equipment. Each equipment takes inlet streams, performs a calculation (isenthalpic, isentropic, equilibrium, etc.), and produces outlet streams.
Feed Stream → [Separator] → Gas Out Stream
→ Liquid Out Stream
Equipment is assembled into a ProcessSystem (flowsheet) and solved
sequentially with recycle convergence as needed.
10. Best Practices
Anatomy of a Good Prompt
A weak prompt gets a generic answer. A good prompt names the agent, the fluid, the conditions, and the deliverable.
| Ingredient | Weak | Strong |
|---|---|---|
| Agent | (none) | @flow-assurance |
| Fluid | “some gas” | “85% C1, 8% C2, 4% C3, 2% CO2, 1% N2, water-saturated” |
| Conditions | “high pressure” | “20 to 200 bara, 4 degrees C seabed” |
| Standard | (none) | “per NORSOK P-002” |
| Deliverable | “tell me about hydrates” | “hydrate curve plus a Word report” |
Putting them together:
@flow-assurance Calculate the hydrate formation curve from 20 to 200 bara
for a water-saturated gas of 85% C1, 8% C2, 4% C3, 2% CO2, 1% N2, and
report the MEG dosage needed for a 4 degrees C seabed with 3 K margin.
For Beginners
- Start with
@neqsim.help— describe your problem in plain language and let the router pick the right agent - Be specific about conditions — include temperature, pressure, and composition in your request
- Mention standards if applicable — “per ISO 6976” or “per DNV-OS-F101” triggers deeper analysis
- Use
@capability-scoutfor complex tasks — check what is available before starting
For Experienced Users
- Go directly to specialist agents — skip the router if you know which discipline applies
- Use
@solve-taskfor formal deliverables — it produces Word + HTML reports with validation - Check
TASK_LOG.mdfor past solutions — avoid solving the same problem twice - Contribute improvements back — when you discover a gap, the agent can create a NeqSim Improvement Proposal (NIP)
Common Pitfalls
| Pitfall | Why It Happens | How to Avoid |
|---|---|---|
| Zero density or viscosity | Missing initProperties() after flash |
Agents handle this automatically via skills |
| Wrong EOS for polar systems | Using SRK instead of CPA for water/MEG | Specify “with water” in your request — the agent selects CPA |
| Convergence failure | Conditions outside EOS validity | The troubleshooting skill provides recovery strategies |
| Java 9+ compile errors | Using var, List.of() in Java code |
The java8-rules skill prevents this |
11. Comparison with Traditional Approaches
| Aspect | Manual Coding | Commercial Simulator | NeqSim + AI Agents |
|---|---|---|---|
| Learning curve | Steep (learn API) | Moderate (learn GUI) | Low (natural language) |
| Scripting support | Full control | Limited macro language | Full Python + Java |
| Standards compliance | Manual lookup | Some built-in | Agent loads applicable standards |
| Reproducibility | Good (version-controlled code) | Poor (GUI state not tracked) | Excellent (notebook + task folder) |
| Cost | Free (open source) | Expensive licenses | Free (open source + Copilot) |
| Physics rigor | Full (you control everything) | Full (vendor-validated) | Full (same NeqSim engine) |
| Report generation | Manual | Manual export | Automated Word + HTML |
| Extensibility | Add Java classes | Vendor-dependent | Add Java + agent understands it |
12. Where to Go Next
Suggested order for a new user: run the tutorial, skim the agent reference, then keep the API patterns skill open while you work.
| Goal | Resource |
|---|---|
| Solve your first task | Solve an Engineering Task tutorial |
| See all agents and skills | Agents and Skills Reference |
| See real workflow examples | Agentic Workflow Examples |
| Learn NeqSim Java API | API Patterns |
| Check NeqSim capabilities | Capability Map |
| Browse example notebooks | Examples Index |
| Start from Python | Python Quickstart |
Cheat Sheet
Keep this next to you for the first week.
The five commands you will use most
| Command | Use it when |
|---|---|
@neqsim.help <problem> |
You do not know which agent to pick |
@thermo-fluid <question> |
You need a fluid property or a flash |
@process-model <description> |
You need a flowsheet built and run |
@solve-task <task> |
You need a documented, validated deliverable |
@capability-scout <task> |
You want to know if NeqSim can do it at all |
Prompt template
@<agent> <what to calculate>
Fluid: <composition or fluid type>
Conditions: <temperature, pressure, flow rate>
Standard: <ISO / API / NORSOK / DNV reference, if any>
Deliver: <number | plot | notebook | report>
Unit conventions in the NeqSim Java API
| Quantity | Default unit |
|---|---|
| Temperature | K (kelvin) |
| Pressure | bara (bar absolute) |
| Flow rate | kg/hr |
| Density | kg/m3 |
Three rules the agents enforce for you
- Always set a mixing rule:
fluid.setMixingRule("classic") - Always call
fluid.initProperties()after a flash, before reading density, viscosity, or thermal conductivity - Never use Java 9+ syntax — NeqSim must compile with Java 8
Glossary
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Agent | An AI assistant with specific instructions, domain knowledge, and tool access. Each agent handles one engineering discipline. |
| Skill | A knowledge package (markdown file) loaded by agents to provide domain-specific rules and patterns. |
| Router | The @neqsim.help agent that analyzes requests and delegates to specialists. |
| Capability Scout | The @capability-scout agent that assesses what NeqSim can do for a given task. |
| Flash Calculation | The core thermodynamic calculation that determines phase composition and properties at given conditions. |
| EOS | Equation of State — the mathematical model relating pressure, volume, temperature, and composition. |
| CPA | Cubic-Plus-Association — an EOS extension for hydrogen-bonding molecules (water, alcohols). |
| NIP | NeqSim Improvement Proposal — a structured plan for adding a missing capability. |
| ProcessSystem | NeqSim’s flowsheet container that holds equipment, streams, and convergence logic. |
| Task Folder | The task_solve/ subfolder where all artifacts for an engineering task are stored. |
| jneqsim | The Python gateway to NeqSim’s Java classes, provided by the neqsim-python package. |
| initProperties() | Critical method that must be called after a flash calculation to initialize transport properties. |